<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have you heard of sharogle?</title>
	<link>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/</link>
	<description>generating revenue for your website or blog with contextual advertising</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 22:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: coldtobi</title>
		<link>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/#comment-1893</link>
		<dc:creator>coldtobi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 15:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/#comment-1893</guid>
		<description>I dont know if it is against the TOS. But I know, that Google thinks it is against it:
I got a mail from Google telling me.
And that thats count.

See also my article: http://blog.coldtobi.de/1/post/81</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know if it is against the TOS. But I know, that Google thinks it is against it:<br />
I got a mail from Google telling me.<br />
And that thats count.</p>
<p>See also my article: <a href="http://blog.coldtobi.de/1/post/81" rel="nofollow">http://blog.coldtobi.de/1/post/81</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techie</title>
		<link>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>techie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>Why would this be against Google's TOS ?

There are sites like hubpages.com and others that give points  for posting which will determine your share of your adsense revenues with them. Isn't this more reason to induce clicks since all you have to do is get your friends to click on your ads? With sharogle it is not possible to do this.

What about www.blingo.com that uses google's search where you can win gifts for searching? They have been around for a few years now and I don't see them having any problems.

Also I've looked the sharogle site and I see a great idea that could be huge and I see no reason not to use it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would this be against Google&#8217;s TOS ?</p>
<p>There are sites like hubpages.com and others that give points  for posting which will determine your share of your adsense revenues with them. Isn&#8217;t this more reason to induce clicks since all you have to do is get your friends to click on your ads? With sharogle it is not possible to do this.</p>
<p>What about <a href="http://www.blingo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.blingo.com</a> that uses google&#8217;s search where you can win gifts for searching? They have been around for a few years now and I don&#8217;t see them having any problems.</p>
<p>Also I&#8217;ve looked the sharogle site and I see a great idea that could be huge and I see no reason not to use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/#comment-1688</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2007 00:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.contentadsguide.com/have-you-heard-of-sharogle/#comment-1688</guid>
		<description>Isn't that against google's TOS?

users must only visit the pages based on their own interest.

Wouldn't handing out points for searching be incentivizing the users to view the pages with adsense?

I donno, just seems kind of touchy to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t that against google&#8217;s TOS?</p>
<p>users must only visit the pages based on their own interest.</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t handing out points for searching be incentivizing the users to view the pages with adsense?</p>
<p>I donno, just seems kind of touchy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
